CityPass itself is quite ok - what I have to complain about it: The enclosed belongs City plan combined - stations (transport links across Rome) Here you are able to get a busy all the time with the metro stations or bus until there is rightly and then there are still problems with the stations - the use of the pass is easy - purely in the respective \"vehicle\" pull pass over it - that's it !!! Overall, a great thing. (We had deal with a strike by taxi drivers) Entrance to the Vatican Museum & Sistine Chapel also worked perfectly- without queuing. However, onsite we were persuaded into a guided tour in German - and obviously never had one!!! How should it be otherwise - Bella Italia !! Total positive - but the price / performance ratio is not really justified.
The Rome City Pass was worth it. Although pricewise narrowly, but even more regarding less queuing at the sights. Just a pity that one of two cards did not work, so each time we had to ask for help at the metro or museum there. The employees were aware of the problem, so they let us in without discussion. Still annoying.
In the major attractions not to queuing, is worth gold. Great value for money in this matter! Otherwise, it is priced acceptable, savings remains limited.
Unfortunately, we were not able to visit the Castel Sant' Angelo as promised without queuing.
For our party of 6, I do not feel we received our money's worth with the Turbopass. Unless you plan to intentionally \"cram\" as many possible things as possible in a day, you will not get your money's worth.
- Rome is walkable so we only used public transportation a couple of times. - The Colosseum and Palatine Hill, and Forum is an all-day evolution and is not very expensive. It is difficult to realistically fit another museum/attraction in so you might as well just buy your tickets on your own. Plus, the pass only covers \"basic entry\". You must pay for any upgrades in your tour.
- Having tickets to the Vatican Museums is recommended to avoid entry lines, however you can buy these separately online as well. Again, they're not that expensive and Vatican City altogether is a full day.
The use of transport with the City Pass was unclear to me. We took the bus and hoped that it would be sufficient to have the City Pass card with you.
Furthermore, the pick-up of tickets for the city tour is not optimal. Better would be a free travel ticket with no prior visit of a ticket office.
Use of the Museum card did not work in the Castel Sant'Angelo. However, the staff was very nice and let us in anyway. Otherwise the admission went smoothly and we were able to actually skip the line at the museum. Unfortunately, time was too short to use the pass extensively.
Conclusion: the card is very expensive, but it saves a lot of time and nerves. However, one should think about alternatives if there is only time for a few museums.
Overall still worthwhile because you - especially the Vatican - a great time saver!
Very disorganized. No obvious places in Rome to explain the pass. Limited instructions in the pack. it was a taste it and see experience. In the end i think we just about got our moneys worth.
Almost everything correctly! resulting in the price Services (Museums admissions) are partly free even without a passport. The tour ticket is cumbersome.
still queued long at the Vatican. There you should go to the checkout, at Colosseum as long queues because hundreds of other visitors had also pass. There, the pass has brought no waiting advantages.
Dear Romreisende, first, it was very nice, not least because of the warm weather in late October / early November, after all, even to the 25-30 ° C. Recommended is an apartment, for example, as we on the Via Nazionale. As good as everything is within walking distance, only to the Vatican we took the Metro. The metro network is small, 2 lines. Buses run frequently, inside the bus, unfortunately, no info as in the metro where you just located, so it is difficult to see where you could get the best and where you currently are. That is when the first review: No bus schedule with stops marking thereby the Rompass. The map is labeled very small and not well considered color to dark colors. Positive am Pass is that you come in past quickly in the Vatican on the ground and also the Colosseum. Why not Roman in the basilica and forum? What's not to understand that in order to take the Sigthseeingbus may again have to visit the Vatican, to get a "ticket". We see our entry at Termini would have been much more comfortable now. We have yet purchased the Rome City Pass. Why a ticket for a ticket get? The pass is quite expensive and should cover the above-mentioned services with. Another positive aspect is that several admission fees for exhibitions, we visited the Picasso exhibition or the old masters of 15./16.Jahrhunderts contained in the passport for example. Throughout the former workers' district of Rome, Trastevere is recommended as worth seeing. Do not go out, it is not worthwhile, there are nicer places e. g. Piazza Lorenzo.
I bought the 3 days Turbopass Rome for 2 adults and 1 11 year old. The price is already steep. The documentation, how it all works, could be better. The Vaticanvisit worked great, at the Colosseum we were with about 30 minutes of waiting pure (instead of 2 hours or more). The bus ride is no need. I am also still not clear how many tickets are free. We have de facto Colosseum / Roman Forum / Vatican Museums and Castel Sant'Angelo consumed, and a 1.5-hour drive to Rome. And of course the subway. Good would be two examples of what you should visit on 2 or 3 days and then paid / or is included.
In principle, the Rome city pass is not wrong, but sometimes cumbersome for example. the Colosseum to get as an adult with the ball purely as normal but for a child you have a 0 ticket at checkout pick so that it comes in. Perhaps it would also be useful to write in the brochure that its not allowed to bring drinks with you. We had the 72 hour pass. But he was not 72 hours valid that was less enjoyable. In addition, the staff of City Pass in Rome did not really know where you can enter in the city tour that has a lot of time cost. Positive is definitely: - to the queue over - flexible with bus and metro go
Basically the Rome Pass is a good thing. The big advantage is the snakes over and the free rides in public transport. The pity is that it is not clearly described in the order where the transport moves. It would be good to describe clear that the Leonardo Express to the airport is not present! The fact that for the first city tour has to visit one of the two offices, we find inconvenient. It would be better if one could enter at one of the stops.
For me he was definitely not worth it, although it sounds good at the snakes at the entrance quickly over, but that was only good at the Vatican City and Colloseum, but it would not have needed, since waiting time would have been only 30 minutes, must say I was in September. St. Peter's Cathedral is free anyway, and many things listed in the list too. Castel Sant'Angelo was not there and the Hopp on hopp off bus only one day.
Being of the older generation only took printed copy of the city passes but some places wouldn't even try to scan them some did and they worked fine, but other would only scan mobile phone pdf which we hadn't got.
By and large, I find the Turbo Pass okay ... but we arrived at the airport, because we did not take a bus in the direction of Termini, so we had to rechachieren by mobile phone first which bus number goes to the metro ... there passed something Time ... Hop and Hop Buse the same ... asked at least 10 red tits ... no one wanted to take us ... they were sent from there to there ... so time passed ... at the Vatican we were intercepted and persuaded something else to book ... for 2 people 72 euros ... the madness --- so I paid for three days Rome City Pass over 300 euros ... I was very ettäuscht
I found the Turbopass for Rome difficult to use because many of the sites were far from each other or required me to go to a museum . Given the poor weather on my trip, I did not use most of this pass.
This pass also did not include many of the sites that were closer to where I was staying and would like to have seen.
We felt like we could have gotten more for our money by buying tickets there and doing tours with a guide. The pass did not get us better or easier access to the places we wanted to go.
The idea behind it is a great one. Be aware of what is possible to see in a day. We are not experienced travellers so we thought we it would be a great way to get familiar with Rome. By the time we figured out how to use the passes etc well enough to make them useful they had expired